Nupur Sharma's quotation of Sahih Bukhari, outrage from the Middle East and the BJP's reaction.

 A few days ago, two major violent interactions took over the talk all over India. The first was the attempted riot in Kanpur, and the second was a small clip from a television debate, broadcasted by Al-Jazeera, the Qatari royal family's mouthpiece to the world, alleging a statement of blasphemy by the BJP's National Spokesperson Nupur Sharma.

While UP police reacted immediately to the riot in Kanpur and not only brought the situation under control immediately, but also started identifying, publicizing and arresting the rioters, there was lull on Nupur Sharma's statement quoting Sahih Bukhari about the prophet's wife Ayesha for the first 3-4 days, and people had forgotten all about it. Then, as per his day job, Alt News "fact-checker" Md. Zubair started circulating a distorted clip of the debate from a few days ago, and it was picked up by Al-Jazeera.

As the clip reached the world, a bunch of OIC countries from the Arab world started echoing the objection raised wrongly by Zubair, taking it as an opportunity to show down Zimmi India its place, as they were extremely irritated by the fact that India has increased its buying of Russian crude oil from less than 1% to around 17% of its need since the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine war, and it was at the cost of the OIC countries, many of which are part of OPEC as well.

While the BJP government supported our foreign minister Dr. S Jaishankar in telling the West to back off, on this issue, they decided to placate the Muslim countries. But Why? They could very well have shown the clip to the objecting parties and supported their spokesperson, stating she simply quoted what is in the Hadis. The matter would have died off, and no one would be the wiser.

However by assuaging the Muslim countries, they have made sure that the hullabaloo doesn't die off. This in fact is deliberate in my opinion. In order to understand why it is so, we must pay attention to the actions taken by the government after placating the ambassadors. While the outrage of BJP's ever widening support base continues to hog the media, the government has put its agencies on task to mark and destroy major troublemakers from the forever-rebels and secessionists. While they are yet to touch the likes of Owaisi or Mohua Moitra, many second rung troublemakers have already had FIRs made against them on grounds of hurting religious sentiments, while includes the likes of Saba Naqvi. On the other hand, the troublemaker's outrage over Kanpur arrests is getting suppressed by the so-called persecution and abandonement of Nupur Sharma as well.

Nupur has not only been removed as a spokesperson of the BJP, but her primary membership of BJP has also been suspended, and Delhi Police has lodged an FIR on her under respective clauses of IPC. What does that translate to though? It translates to a well-orchestrated fabricated punishment, from which Nupur Sharma will come out unscathed as long as the BJP doesn't actually wash their hands off her, in which case it will easily go to the looney crowd's anger finishing her off. Her trial will end in acquittal as it will be easily proved that she did not twist anything from the Hadis, and her statement was verbatim. On the other hand, every major figure who has in past few years spewed venom on the cosmology of Sanatana Dharma will face strong punishment, if the judiciary's mind is not tilted towards being Zimmi.

It appears that the BJP has started to learn the utility of plausible deniability, and this time it may be used in testing capacity, but if the tactic succeeds, the enemies of Bharat and Sanatana Dharma should be shivering in fear.

Balancing the scales: Bringing equity to women at work

 I have pondered over the question of the equality of men and women and their roles in society for past few years, and often racked my brain on what would be a truly balanced expectation from a "modern" woman. Ignoring the woke bullies that will rant that everyone can do everything, to me it is very clear that if men and women are not the same biologically, then they are very much like 2 different tools, made to accomplish different tasks.

Biologically speaking, women have tender bodies, and it is extremely difficult for them to develop muscle mass. While they can develop great endurance to do physical work, their bodies are not designed for fighting. Women however, have better eyesight and metabolism than men in general. They can see more colours and generally encounter fewer problems in their digestive system in their later years. Women also are less susceptible to heart problems than men. The human female brain is designed to have both halves working with equal activity, whereas male brain is designed to have one half of the brain as more active than the other.

This means that women are better at multitasking and make for great managers, while men are better at navigation and make better leaders. In military roles, women are better at defense, and men are better with attack. Every entity – a home, a business, a country – needs both types of roles to be fulfilled, and instead of running amok by buying into woke communist propaganda of men and women being "equal", we need to accept that both are "equitable" and necessary parts of society.

No society can sustain itself without BOTH men and women. No society can become truly prosperous without BOTH men and women understanding their strengths clearly and cooperating with each other in fulfilling their roles in society. Men in commerce define function, and women define aesthetics. Can a product that works well but has poor aesthetics be sold in the market? You can try – and bankrupt yourself in the process. Can a good looking product that doesn't work sell? Get ready for customers abusing you.

In the 20th century, many fallacies and deceptive ideas were propagated by communists as well as lobbyists working for corporations post WW2. " Woman can do all the things that men can do" "Women working in the industry are doing credible work, but housewives don't work"

"Women don't need men for a happy and fulfilling life"

"Women shouldn't have to bear children, and being made to bear children is oppression of the ((Patriarchy))" "All men are trash." Every single one of these conceptions have hurt only women.

By saying that men and women are "equal" meaning they are same and replaceable with each other, greedy corporations and communists obsessed with uniformity deprive women of their femininity and importance in society. Chivalry and good manners are endangered by this sameness.

This "sameness" narrative is one of the reasons that has lead our world into impotency. We sent people to the moon with ANALOG computers less powerful than a cheap smartphone of our age. Why are we stuck in earth's orbits for last 50 years?

Computing was a women's profession in its early days, while mechanical and other forms of "hard" engineering were men's fields. The first "Program" ever was "written" by Ada Lovelace.

Then we got into the stupid argument of "Men vs Women", because according to uniformity loving communists, they should be considered the same! Not just that, by turning "software engineering" into a male-dominated profession, the work culture has been completely destroyed with infinite hours and abusive workforce hierarchies. There are many capable women in the field, but this abusive work culture forces them out.

Coming back to the original thought, my second question has been about the ideal expectations of society and ideal conditions for work for women. Owing to their biology, women have different needs than men, and this does make an impact on how they deliver commercial value, not on how well they do it.

To put them in the same roles that are actually designed for men is to be amateurish in the use of human resources. With the amount of large scale data available today, we can easily analyze the opportunities for redesigning jobs where women excel to match their needs, allowing better utilization of their talent and capability. The costs incurred will outweigh the benefits. I advocate the acceptance of the family and social duties of women by commercial establishments at EVERY scale. Small firms allow women to take care of family needs, but it is always grudgingly, or after a woman has done significant work to add value to the firm.

It should be perfectly acceptable and even expected that there be few women working between the age of 24 and 32, and most women in an office be either new workers below 24 years of age or married with kids in school above 32 years. Women in an office between 24 and 32 years should be the exception. They either married even earlier so have school-going kids earlier, or are in courtship and looking to settle down as soon as the economics work.

Unlike some apologetic fools, I don't believe in accepting "open relationships" in society. Such relationships always favor womanizers and degenerates. Marriage has been one of the foundations of strong societies, and it is not wrong for society to expect youth to marry. Even a "Live In Relationship" must adhere to the rules of a Gandharva Vivah, that is, commitment of the partners to each other through thick and thin.

Supreme Court of India is right in recognizing "live in relationships" as equivalent to "marriage", or Daiva Vivah. Along with this, the pride associated with "going out to work" needs to be completely demolished. It is 2021. We have all been working from home for a year. Homemakers' efforts need to be recognised at par with commercial work.

Impacts of colonization on Hindu society and reviving its dynamic structure.

While we pride ourselves in inheriting the legacy of a great unbroken Hindu civilization, the last 1200 years have been a history of bitter truths – of losing to the deceitful and asymmetrical tactics of warfare utilized by theopolitical creeds of middleast.

There is much that has become obfuscated in our history, and a large chunk of it is the twisting and distortion of our customs and social structure.

Specifically, how the sections of our society that resisted foreign aggression were enslaved and forced to bottom of our society.

Throughout the world, great empires and civilizations crumbled in front of Islam and Christianity, but the legendary warriors of Bharatvarsh fought hard for 600 years to keep the barbarians at bay.

The first crack appeared in Afghanistan, where the barbarians kept attacking the RAJPUT kingdoms till they uprooted it, while the kings of Afghan states barely received help from mainland of Bharat owing to the difficult terrain and them being in the frontiers.

Then came the conversion of the king of Kashmir in the 9th century.
(While Sindh was the first frontier state to be attacked, Afghan states were first to collapse under the Islamist onslaught.
This is where the cautionary tale of repeated exodus of Kashmiri Pandits began, as they refused Islam.

Still, the kingdoms of northern Bharat kept the Islamist invaders at bay till the end of 12th century.
However, from Muhammad of Ghor onwards, a series of Islamist invaders ravaged the heartland of Aryavart.

We have read this and the many atrocities these marauders committed.

What the Hindu nationalist easily picks up is the violence committed on all sections of Hindu society. What she or he cannot wrap her/his head around is the indignities all Hindu Jatis were made to suffer.

The first aspect of it was the systematic destruction of our knowledge centers, beginning with the campaign of Jalaluddin Khalji. The Islamists systematically destroyed universities, burned libraries which contained millions of unique manuscripts with irreplaceable knowledge.

Along with this they killed and anslaved all academics who were source of all that knowledge, restricting its flow in society. The only gurus left were those outside of the universities and major institutions, still being a substantial lot, but not as capable as the Masters.

This meant the creation of a knowledge vacuum in society, which the missionaries of Islam could exploit to confuse and convert the most vulnerable Hindus – the regular working class or the Shudras.

Islam being the antithesis of Sanatan sanskriti, defines quality of income in the exact opposite way.
While Hindu teachings stress on honest earning through hardwork, the best kind of income in Islam is considered from the work of slaves.

This ethic was pushed hard upon the subjects by the Islamists, as their was no slavery in Bharat before them, and they saw Hindus as lowly people who did all their work by their own hands.

This ethic meant a fundamental change in Hindu society – instead of a symbiotic relationship between all Hindu jatis, this ethic of abhoring hard work meant those who work with their hands in vocational skills went to the bottom of a Jati hierarchy.

Over the course of 6 centuries, this hierarchical social structure became formalised in Hindu society, as every new generation of Hindus were taught these values by their elders, who didn't know any better.

Despite this distortion, till the time the British conquered Bharat, people of different Jatis could easily change their trade, and enter another "Biradari".
This can be clearly seen in biography of Raja Ramamohan Roy.

The British took the distortion of Hindu society a step further, forcing the freezing of family professions from the first census onward.

It was the British that created the Scheduled Castes.

The other aspect of distortion of Hindu society was "untouchability" becoming commonplace.

As per our original social structure, people of the four Varnas – Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Shudra were part of the respectable society.

Only outcast criminals and Chandals – people who lived in filth, had no manners and consumed meat indiscrimately – were untouchable.

When Islamists enslaved Bharat, they often force fed beef to the captured people, leading to them being labelled untouchables.

Eventually as these captured Jatis were released with the aim of causing more 'pollution' in society, and it was essentially impossible to figure out who was force fed beef and who wasn't, the whole Jati would get branded as "untouchable" after being captured by Mlechchhas.

The combined effect of the destruction of dignity of labour, expansion of untouchability, and the freezing of Jatis has left Hindu society in paralysis, and is the toxin that has been killing it, slowly but surely.

While we may never be able to regain the lost knowledge of ancient universities like Nalanda, it is imperative that we identify these 3 factors in Hindu society and begin transforming it into and equitable and dynamic community.

1. We must teach our youth to respect hardwork and skills of hands. This will ensure both an economically stronger community and preservation of traditional crafts.

2. While untouchability has been mostly removed in society by force of law, chauvinistic attitudes and looking down upon Shudra Jatis needs to be uprooted completely. This can be helped by reestablishing the Sanskars in these Jatis.

3. The crypto-Christian colonial state of "Republic of India" reinforces "Caste" by asking the Jati of our ancestors. We can easily turn it on its head by registering our Jati based on our profession, and not passing it to our children unless they take the same profession as us.

Finally, we must stop looking at bureaucracy, law enforcement and government to improve our lot, as the ball is in our court.

Preserving Hindu Identities in the face of Abrahamic Political Doctrines

Islam is banned in Bhutan. Bhutan is the last remaining "Hindu" state.
Nepal threw away that privilege and submitted to Maoists.
India was already a proto-Christian, Anti-Hindu state. With over a billion of the world's 7 billion population being "Hindus", why do Hindu voices not matter? 

While Christo-Islam invades one state after the other culturally, scrubbing the territories clean of their original culture and obfuscating their histories, branding them as "myth", Sanatan Dharma and its offshoots are the only umbrella that embraces every native culture it touches.

And still, those of these exclusivist, chauvinist and racist creeds claim victim cards, while Hindus are shamed over barely asking for a dignified existence by the descendants of mass murderers who themselves intend to emulate their ancestors if allowed. 

They call Hindus new names every now and then. "Cow Piss Drinkers" is their favorite.
When they are countered with hard scientific explanation for Hindu practices, they either go quiet, indulge in whataboutery, or change the platform and keep beating the same drum. 

So how can we fight them in this asymmetric warfare? 

1. Before we plan counter attacks on an enemy, we must re-assess our own fortress.
In the last 1000 years or so, Sanatan Dharma has lost true grassroots reach. How many devout Sanatani men or women have read even the Sanskrit Ramayan, Mahabharat or even Bhagavadgita? 

... (1) contd.
A large chunk of our rituals today are non-compliant with their Puranic or Agamic roots. 

The first and foremost duty of every Sanatani Adult is to find sources to educate themselves on core Hindu texts, be it the Vedas, Upanishads, Puranas or the Itihasas.
Just as important is to impart this knowledge to the children from an early age by the parents. 

By the age of 18, every child in a Sanatani family should at least have read and understood a translation of the texts, and should be fluent in at least reading Sanskrit. 

Along with this, casual readings of primary writings that chronicle our history, from ancient to modern, should be encouraged in the place of young adult fiction like Harry Potter. 

2. As we do this, we need to Sanskritise every vernacular language, from Kashmiri to Kannada and from Gujarati to Assamese, replacing every Urdu, Persian, Arabic and English word, till we only have those foreign words left in our vernaculars, which don't have a native parallel. 

3. If we have achieved a common linguistic connect as well as an understanding of our core texts at a common level, and everyone's concepts of what OUR core texts say will be clear, and we would not be divided due to local, linguistic barriers.
Then we will b ready to face others 

4. Scrub our educational institutions clean of communists. Communists are the enemy of nations and ethnic identities.
They have conspired and played on the faultlines of Hindu society for almost 50 years now. Through academics, they have networked into business and media. 

5. Actively update our Itihasas, Smritis and Shastras to reflect on current times, today's problems and the rules of living a good life for Sanatanis of today.
Because of centuries of breakdown of certifying institutions, our codex has become obsolete. 

It is this obsolescence that allows our enemies to attack the very fabric of our society, our faith and our identity.
It also allows for miscreants to spread dogmas in the name of dharmic rituals.
For this purpose, the Akhada Parishad must accredit education and research centers. 

Conclusion

If we are able to achieve all the above 5 steps, we will have the upper hand in the fight to keep Bharat as the homeland of Hindus.

@Aprameya_Uma_11 @pria_s1 @sarcastheek @aellathur @Slayr_of_Titan @BesuraTaansane 

1. First 2 sentences were meant to get your attention.
2. When I say Hindu, I don't only address Sanatan Dharma. Hindu includes Sanatan Dharma and every offshoot of Sanatan Dharma. Vajrayan Buddhism is an original Indian Buddhist subsect. Don't b confused.

Police brutality in Munger: urban naxal infiltrator SP of Munger uses police force to disrupt Durga puja tradition, orders firing of live rounds, killing and injuring devotees.

Thread on Twitter by Anupam Singh(@AnupamS40753639) of Munger on the terrible incident:

1)Dear Twitter friends
My heart bleeds and my soul writhes in pain, writing this tweet about what happened in Munger yesterday

I usually do not write threads, but today I’m pouring my heart out. Please go through it friends

I’m a native of Munger (my birthplace). It’s a small

2) & historical town of Bihar, situated along the bank of river Ganga. It may have wrong reasons to be famous 4 but the one good thing it’s famous 4 is ‘Durga Puja’ & even more the ‘Iconic Visarjan’

Munger’s Durga Puja is special & different in the way that, it follows certain

3) hierarchy i.e. The most revered is Badi Durga Maharani, then Chhoti Durga, Badi Kali & Chhoti Kali. During Visarjan this hierarchy is particularly maintained. Badi Durga, Chhoti Durga & Badi Kali are ceremoniously taken on the shoulders of 32 Kahars in a very pious manner.4) There is a certain route which used to be strictly followed, with fixed stops for various reasons like Milan, Arti etc. on the way.

This time it was no different, in terms of Devi Ma’s ceremonies, but in the wake of pandemic, religious fervour was largely dampened.

5) The highest authority of ‘Badi Durga Samiti’ is the SP of the town. The samiti members had requested the SP to ask for a different date for Munger election, but she did nothing. Then the samiti members asked her to reschedule Visarjan for 29th, she still didn’t agree

6) Yesterday samiti members started visarjan ceremonies well in time, but Durga Ma could not be moved an inch from her place. That’s how it’s been since years, whenever people tried to modify anything. It never worked.

Lastly, around 4pm the procession started. The whole town

7) was filled with BSF & CRPF battalions and they kept poking the karyakartas all through their way. Just imagine the pressure on them. Whoever lends a shoulder to Murti of Durga Ma (other than Kahars) has to be barefoot, no leather stuff on the body, not consumed non veg.

8) There was a point when Devi Ma was kept on the ground at one of the stops, police force started pressurising karyakartas once again. They tried to lift the Murti, but they failed. When they made several attempts & failed, policemen said, people are deliberately doing it

9) karyakartas still did not fuss & moved back & asked administration to take over, if they are able to move the statue. They made 17 failed attempts but couldn’t move a bit. Finally, Ma moved only at the previous scheduled time for that stop
This was unacceptable to the tyrant

10) SP. She ordered the police force to make other Devis overtake Badi Durga Ma and hasten the visarjan, now it got 2 much for the people. The karyakartas with other Devis started arguing the policemen & it was then that the HELL BROKE. Several rounds of firing by police stampede

11)& in mnts the mammoth crowd dispersed. The streets which was echoing with Devi Ma’s jaykara was deserted. Only the Kahars & the karyakartas of Badi Durga Ma remained with the Murti, who were brutally beaten by Policemen in uniform & in civil dress. Later even they left

12)Somehow Badi Durga Ma was brought on shoulders of random people, no Maha Arti, other idols immersed before Badi Devi. The traditions, religious sentiments all were ravaged
Lastly when Badi Devi reaches Ganga ghat she is veiled from all sides, her gold jewellery is removed &

13) replaced by artificial ones & finally at the time of immersion Ma is blindfolded with a cloth, when her crown is removed. The same person who adorns, removes the jewellery. This time, no veils, random person cuts the jewellery to remove it & finally the idol was immersed

14)Chhoti Durga who also comes on Kahar was forcibly put on a dirty Municipality tractor and literally thrown into Ganga by JCB
Badi Kali reached Ganga ghat with broken limbs

People of Munger are more than devastated

"Caste" - the biggest scam in the history of India

Today I want to write a thread about the biggest scam of in the history of India.

It began with the British in the mid 1800's, and has been continued by their mental slaves till date.

But the pre-conditions that allowed it were created by Islamist invaders since around 711 AD.

With the decline of Takshashila from the lead of India's intellectual core since Alexander's invasion, Indic knowledge systems had begun to suffer a decline.
While other centers in Bharatavarsh thrived and developed new work in every area of academics, the dynamism of ideas and

Social mobility slowed down, as evident from the rise of movements like Buddhism, Ajivikas and Jainism.

As more and more territory suffered the atrocities, plunder and destruction by barbarian invaders over the centuries, they often targeted academic and cultural centers.

These were sanctuaries, and by their very nature, were soft targets for marauders.

They were targets for easy money by pre-Islamic barbarians such as the Scythians, but for Islamists such as those who swore allegiance to the Ummayids, these centers represented enemies of Islam.

The Ummayid Caliphate burned books from Spain to India, and killed, enslaved and tortured millions of non-Muslims, used every way possible to erase previous cultures throughout their empire.

Their successors were not much different.

After Bin Kasim, Mahmud of Ghazna successfully conquered Indian states in modern Afghanistan and Pakistan, and was never repulsed from these regions.

Muhammad of Ghor entered even further into Indian territory, and finally laid the foundation of a Sultanate in Delhi.

From the vassals of the Ghurid Empire to the Mughals, descendants of the Great Khans of the Mongol empires, Islamist marauders kept persecuting the native Indians, and forcing them to renounce their own culture and faith, and continually destroyed Indic institutions of excellence

While those who survived their brutal oppression did their best to preserve their knowledge, culture, identity and traditions, as certifying authorities that powered the dynamism of Hindu society were lost, their place was taken by new, less competent institutions.

These institutions were mostly at micro level, in the form of one or a handful of Brahmins, who, most commonly, were not as learned as the great Rishis and Acharyas of the erstwhile universities and eminent institutions.

Their incompetence led to the core texts being either misinterpreted for their followers and seekers, and led to the spread of dogmas and errant practices entering the Sanatan Dharma.

The ever-looming presence of the barbarians also led to many preventive practices being adopted

These practices today include Ghunghat in the western and Northern parts of India, as well as marriages consummating in the dark of the night, and a strict practice of marrying within the community.

As we all know from more than one source, Varna is defined by a person's nature and aptitude, and Jati from their trade.
A person's lineage is defined by his Gotra and his/her family tree defines the family Varna, which defines the Sanskaras the person should go through.

While this system is designed to make the children follow in their elders' footsteps, it didn't originally bind people to the Varna of their family.

This mobility and freedom of work also started to get lost as institutions that allowed people to train in a trade of their choice got destroyed systematically.

The targeted persecution of Brahmins as well as Buddhist and Jain monks meant that those from these communities that survived would find it hard to get enough disciples to pass their knowledge openly, and choose protégés.

They would often end up relying on the capabilities of whoever they could get to teach.
A lot of this knowledge was so vast, the disciples needed to start from an early age, and keep studying till they were full adults.

It was natural for a man of such knowledge to choose his own children to inherit such knowledge, as he had complete control of their conditioning.

This practice became mainstream and was another factor in changing the dynamics of Hindu society.

Eventually, a skilled person, whether academic, artisan or trader, would only teach all they knew to their children, as everyone had finite resources, and the occupiers would destroy any venture large enough to become a new Hindu institution.

The practice of joint families made the transition from institutional to hereditary learning easier too.

While a joint family didn't have so many pupils as to make a decent sized school, there would be enough to somehow pass on the family knowledge and heirlooms.

By the time the British East India Company took control of most parts of Indian territories, Hindus still defined their Varna based on their personal aptitude and Jati based on their profession, but often they worked in the family heirloom, though not always.

The British East India company was founded in feudal Europe, and its officers who understood the European feudal structure, found it hard to wrap their head around the system of the Hindu society, and looked for parallels to map European feudal social structure on Hindus.

Thus, to make it easier for them to identify people and deal with them based on what they knew of the person's community, the British recorded Varna and Jati as Caste, to map Hindus in parallel to the Europeans.

Caste in English, derived from the Portuguese Casta is based on bloodlines, not profession or aptitude, and therefore, not the most accurate way of classifying Hindu society, which was completely based on people's aptitude and profession.

Their confusion was natural, due to the state of Hindu society at the time.

Many community leaders in fact raised objection to the marking of Varna and Jati as Caste for the first census, and also of classifying it as hereditary, but the British ignored them.

By the time the fourth census was conducted by the British, Hindus had accepted the new system, and the old system lived only in name.

As the British introduced democratic setups in their presidencies, they experimented with different kinds of differential voting right systems – sometimes favouring Hindus, sometimes Muslims, and also experimenting with differential rights for British India vs. Princely states.

This was the first time "Caste" began to play a role in the politics of India.

At first, the Indian National Congress was the most dominant force in electoral politics, but eventually was joined by the Muslim League and the Hindu Mahasabha at the national level.

But the biggest role of "Caste" shaped local and regional electoral politics, and politicians with skin in the game understood the importance of the way this system worked, and how they could benefit from it.

By the time India gained independence, these politicians were well entrenched. They had grown into the field knowing the distorted rules set up by the British, and saw them playing to their advantage.

Thus, no one ever raised a voice to uproot "Caste", and bring back Varna-Jati.

Not knowing any better and struggling for barely food, water and housing, the poor people of India accepted whatever their leaders implemented as education as the truth, whereas it was, in fact, indoctrination in a large part.

Now that a large chunk of the populace is rising above poverty, some are realising the finer points of this scam.

"Caste" still plays a role in today's politics and public discourse, as it is beneficial to the successors of the mentally enslaved politicians and civil service.

Thus, a Mahant born in a Kshatriya family is still not recognized by many of these crooks as a Brahmin, and a criminal born in a Brahmin family is not recognized as a Chandaal.

Not even a single MP has ever put even a private bill to abolish "Caste" and "Caste certificate" from government machinery, as "Caste", not "Varna and Jati" are deciding factors for politically beneficial government policies.

"Caste" is a scam introduced to the Hindu society by the British, which has thrived for over 150 years.

I appeal to those of you who have read the whole thread to understand and practice the Varna and Jati system in your life, and pioneer a social change to correct and unite us.